Perbandingan Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Agisoft Metashape Professional dan APS Menci

Authors

  • Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Program Diploma 3 Teknologi Geomatika, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda Author
  • Shabri Indra Suryalfihra Teknologi Geomatika, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda Author
  • Dawamul Arifin Teknologi Geomatika, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda Author
  • F. V. Astrolabe Sian Prasetya Teknologi Geomatika, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51967/gets.v1i2.20

Keywords:

Fotogrametri, UAV, Drone, Agisoft, APS Menci, Orthophoto

Abstract

Photogrammetry is a method of mapping objects on the earth's surface using aerial photographs as a medium. Orthophoto is a product of photogrammetry. Utilization and processing of aerial photo data are increasingly widespread with the support of various adequate software. This study aims to process aerial photo data and determine differences in the quality of orthophotos produced from Agisoft Metashape and APS Menci software. In this study, 714 aerial photo data were taken using the DJI Phantom 3 pro drone, and 9 Ground Control Points were obtained from static measurements using the Comnav T300 Geodetic GPS, processed using the Agisoft Metashape and APS Menci software, starting from Georeferencing, DEM Making, DTM, Editing Semalines, and Orthophoto. The results obtained from this study visually produce orthophotos that have different lighting. APS Menci is brighter than Agisoft Metashape. In addition, there is also a difference in the area of 9.1 Ha from orthophoto where Agisoft Metashape produced 64.61 Ha while APS Menci was 55.51 Ha. The GSD (Ground Sampling Distance) value of Agisoft Metashape is 4.12 cm and APS Menci is 4.2 cm. From the results of the orthophoto semantic quality test obtained from the interpreter it gives a Level 7 score on the NIIRS (National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale) based on the IRARS (Imagery Resolution Assessment and Reporting Standards) table, where the resulting orthophoto can detect steps on stairs. It is recommended to use the Agisoft Metashape software for better results and speed of use.

References

Al Ayyubi, A. S., Cahyono, A. B., & Hidayat, H. (2017). Pemetaan Foto Udara Menggunakan Wahana Fix Wing UAV (Studi Kasus: Kampus ITS Sukolilo). Jurnal Teknik ITS, 6(2), F403-F408.

Hamur, P. K. (2019). Kajian Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Agisoft Photoscan dan PIX4D Mapper. (Doctoral Dissertation, ITN Malang).

Meirarti, R. , Seto, T., & Sartohadi, J. (2019). Uji Akurasi Hasil Teknologi Pesawat Udara Tanpa Awak (Unmanned Aerial Vihicle) Dalam Aplikasi Pemetaan Kebencanaan Kepesisiran. Jurnal Geografi, Edukasi dan Lingkungan (JGEL), 3(1),, 1-17.

Meni, J. V. (2019). Kualitas Orthofoto Terhadap Perbedaan Tinggi Terbang. (Doctoral Dissertation, ITN Malang).

Suryalfihra, S. I. (2016). Analisis Rektifikasi Pemanfaatan Wahana UAV Untuk Pembuatan Peta Dasar Skala 1:5000. (Studi Kasus: Pulau Gili Iyang, Kecamatan Dungkek, Sumenep).

Utomo, B. (2017). Drone Untuk Percepatan Pemetaan Bidang Tanah. Media Komunikasi Geografi, 18(2), 146-155.

Widodo, A. W. (2018). Pembuatan Peta Informasi Bidang Tanah Menggunakan Wahana Drone Jenis Quadcopter Dalam Mendukung Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (Studi Kasus: Desa Pojok, Kec. Tawangsari, Kab. Sukoharjo). (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ardiansyah, A., Suryalfihra, S. I., Arifin, D., & Prasetya, F. V. A. S. (2023). Perbandingan Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Agisoft Metashape Professional dan APS Menci. Journal of Geomatics Engineering, Technology, and Science, 1(2), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.51967/gets.v1i2.20