Perbandingan Hasil Pengolahan Data GPS Geodetic Menggunakan Aplikasi Compass Solution dan Aplikasi Trimble Business Center

Authors

  • Dawamul Arifin Program Studi Teknologi Rekayasa Geomatika dan Survei, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda Author
  • Nadira Ayu Herliana Program Diploma 3 Teknologi Geomatika, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda Author
  • Feri Fadlin Program Studi Teknologi Rekayasa Geomatika dan Survei, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda Author
  • Radik Khairil Insanu Program Studi Teknologi Rekayasa Geomatika dan Survei, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51967/gets.v2i2.37

Keywords:

Software, Compas Solution, Trimble Business Center, GPS Geodetic, perbandingan pengolahan

Abstract

The background of this research is as an effort to determine the level of accuracy in the Compass Solution and Trimble Business Center software. So that you can find software with a better level of accuracy. The purpose of this study is to find out the results of processing static observation data using Compass Solution and Trimble Business Center software to obtain a report on the processing results in the form of point coordinate values. The methods used in measurement activities are absolute and differential methods which are then processed using Compas Solution Software and Trimble Business Center software. The results obtained in this study are the availability of the difference in coordinates X, Y and Z when processing using Compass Solution and Trimble Business Center software. The results of differential method data processing using the Trimbel Business Center application (strategy 3) are closest to the fixed BM coordinate values ​​that have been determined, namely with an average difference in the X value of 7.75 mm, Y value of 17.5 mm, and the average difference The Z value is 266.25 mm. Meanwhile, the results of absolute method data processing using the Compass Solution application (strategy 2) are closest to the fixed BM coordinate values, namely with an average difference in the X value of 1,129 mm, Y value of 229.25 mm, and an average difference in Z value is 1,131 mm.

References

Artini, S. R. (2019). Analisis Nilai Chi-Square dan Ketelitian Harian North, East, dan Up Station GNSS CORS GMU1. Pilar Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 14(01), 1–8.

Irianto, R., & Rassarandi, F. D. (2021). Kajian Perbandingan Luas Hasil Pengukuran Bidang Tanah Menggunakan GPS RTK-Radio dan RTK-NTRIP. JGISE: Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.22146/jgise.63947

Oktavianto, V. N. (2021). Analisis Ketelitian Koordinat Hasil Pengolahan Jaring pada Pengamatan GNSS Statik untuk Studi Deformasi dengan Kombinasi Satelit. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Purnama, F. A. (2022). Studi Ketelitian Hasil Pengolahan Data Pengamatan GNSS Metode Kinematik Menggunakan Aplikasi Gamit Track. In Science (Vol. 7, Issue 1). Universitas Lampung.

Putra, I. G. B., & Cahyadi, M. N. (2016). Analisis Ketelitian Penetuan Posisi Horizontal Menggunakan Antena GPS Geodetik Ashtech ASH111661. 5(2).

Rajabbi, M. (2024). Climate and Environmental Monitoring Using GNSS Remote Sensing. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Ramadhon, S. (2021). Perbandingan Posisi Tiga Dimensi Pengukuran GNSS Menggunakan Metode Diferensial Statik dengan Berbagai Variasi Epoch Rate. JGISE: Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering, 4(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.22146/jgise.66327

Ratnawati, E. A., & Kuncoro, H. (2019). Pengujian Kepresisian Modul GNSS Murah Dual Frequency Pada Pengamatan GNSS Dengan Metode RTK-NTRIP. Reka Geomatika, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.26760/jrg.v2019i1.3075

Romadhon, R. (2018). Analisis Ketelitian Hasil Pengamatan GNSS Berdasarkan Metode dan Lama Pengamatan untuk Efisiensi Pengukuran Ground Control Point. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Tribhuwana, A. (2018). Perbandingan Pengukuran Luas Area antara Theodolit dan Global Positioning System (GPS). Logika, 22(3), 58–64.

Yuwono, B. D., & Apsandi, O. A. (2018). Analisis Pengukuran GNSS Metode Statik dengan Variasi Sampling Rate. Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi Dan Geomatika, 1(02), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.14710/elipsoida.2018.3697

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Arifin, D., Herliana, N. A., Fadlin, F., & Insanu, R. K. (2024). Perbandingan Hasil Pengolahan Data GPS Geodetic Menggunakan Aplikasi Compass Solution dan Aplikasi Trimble Business Center. Journal of Geomatics Engineering, Technology, and Science, 2(2), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.51967/gets.v2i2.37